2015
2014
2013
- Grammatical Agreement. Submitted to International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences 2nd Edition, 2013
- in press: Valency-changing word-formation. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen, and Franz Rainer (eds.) Handbook Word-formation. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
2012
- Argumentstruktur. Wie die lexikalische Information den Satzaufbau steuert. Vorlesung Einführung in die Sprachwissenschaft. FU Berlin 7.Dez.2012
- Case and agreement variation in Indo-Aryan. Vortrag in Leipzig. 5.Dez.2012
- Evolution der Sprache: Über Lebewesen, die am besten kommunizieren können, und Sprachen, die am besten zu lernen sind. Auftaktakademie des Forum Scientiarum, 8. Okt. 2012 Tübingen.
- 2012: Operations on argument structure. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger and Paul Portner (eds.), HSK An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, art. 84 (vol.3), 2224-2259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- 2012: Polarity and constraints on paradigmatic distinctness. In Jochen Trommer (ed.) The morphology and phonology of exponence, 160-194. Oxford UP.
- 2012: Lexical decomposition in grammar. In Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen, and Edouard Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, 307-327. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
- 2006: Argument hierarchy and other factors determining argument realization. In Ina Bornkessel et al. (ed.) Semantic role universals and argument linking, 15-52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [It is claimed that argument hierarchy - rather then thematic roles - determines the realization of arguments; semantic and pragmatic factors, however, play a role in lexical marking and in the potential of subject or object splits.]
- Why is there morphology? Workshop on Theoretical Morphology, Leipzig, 18.6.2006.
- Is dislocation syntax a postglacial property of language? Potsdam, Syntaxkreis, 30.5.2006
- Syntax as the last step in the evolution of language. Cambridge, 7.03.2006
- Variation der Person-Numerus-Flexion in Quechua. Flexionsworkshop, Leipzig, 14.7.2005
- Canonical and noncanonical argument structures - How much underspecified is the lexical entry of a verb? DGfS-Jahrestagung, Köln, 25.2.2006
- Towards a structural typology of verb classes. In Dieter Wunderlich (ed.) Advances in the theory of the lexicon. Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter 2006, 58-166.[Analyzes the various argument linking types for intransitive and transitive verbs from a cross-linguistic perspective, and discusses how the different systems react on a third argument emerging in ditransitive verbs.]
- The challenge by inverse morphology. Lingue e Linguaggio 4, 2005, 195-214. [It is shown that the inverse morphology in the Algonqian languages Plains Cree and Ojibwe neutralizes any lexically determined asymmetry between subjects and objects, and projects the resulting subject-object symmetry even into syntax.]
2004
2003
2002
- Argumentlinking als strukturelle Generalisierung (Inkorporationstyp Nivkh). In M. Bommes et al.(eds.) Sprache als Form, 11-21. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag 2002. [The paleosibirian language Nivkh (= Gilyak) is unique in that the only way of argument linking (i.e. grammatical specification of arguments) is incorporating the lowest argument; neither structural case nor agreement exists.]
- On the nature of dative in Hungarian. In I. Kenesei and P. Siptár (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian 8, 163-184. Budapest; Akadémiai Kiadó 2002. []
- Argument linking types - approached from the perspective of LDG. In Hidekazu Suzuki (ed.) Report of the Special Research-Project for the Typological Investigation of Languages and Cultures of the East and West 2001, Part II. 777-799. University of Tsukuba (Japan) 2002.
2001
2000